Summary of AQTF audit information
As a Pre-qualified Supplier under the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, Bridgeworks Employment and Training is required to publish audit information in relation to it’s compliance with the Australian Quality Training Framework (AQTF). The User Choice program provides public funding paid directly to Pre-qualified Suppliers for the delivery of accredited entry-level training to eligible Apprentices and Trainees. The AQTF is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent, high-quality training and assessment services for the clients of Australia’s vocational education and training system. An AQTF audit reviews evidence of an organisations’ compliance with the requirements of the AQTF Essential Conditions and Standards of Initial/Continuing Registration to confirm that it is achieving quality training and assessment outcomes. The process also identifies opportunities for improvement on these outcomes. This information is published to assist apprentices, trainees and their employers to make informed decisions regarding their selection of a Pre-qualified Supplier for the delivery of training and assessment services.
Qualifications Audited
| Audit Date: | 9-11 March 2010 |
|
Qualification code |
Qualification name |
| TLI31107 | Certificate III in Transport and Logistics (Logistics Operations) |
| FDF30103 | Certificate III in Food Processing |
| BSB20107 | Certificate II in Business |
| SIR20207 | Certificate II in Retail |
| SIT31007 | Certificate III in Hospitality (Catering Operations) |
| LMT31107 | Certificate III in Laundry Operations |
| PRM20104 | Certificate II in Asset Maintenance (Cleaning Operations) |
| CHC30208 | Certificate III in Aged Care |
| CHC50608 | Diploma of Community Services |
| CUV30403 | Certificate III in Arts Administration |
| 30719QLD | Course in Adult Literacy and Numeracy |
| 30496QLD | Course in Load shifting Equipment (partial delivery) |
Explanatory notes: Non-compliance with the AQTF means that requirements of the have not been met based on the evidence reviewed. Non-compliances are categorised as minor, significant or critical. For the purposes of the User Choice 2010 – 2015 program, only significant and Critical non-compliances need to be published. Minor: No, or minor, adverse impact on learners with no serious breakdown of provision of quality training and assessment. Significant: Significant adverse impact on learners with insufficient focus on quality training and assessment outcomes. Critical: Critical adverse impact on learners with widespread or persistent dissatisfaction with services and outcomes.
|
Was non-compliance identified? |
If 'Yes', non-compliance type |
Summary of non-compliance |
Actions taken to rectify the non-compliance |
Has the non-compliance been rectified? |
Other Audit Feedback Provided by Auditors RTO Strengths |
|
Yes/No |
Minor, Significant, Critical |
Yes/No |
|
||
| Standard 1. The RTO provides quality training and assessment across all of its operations | |||||
|
Yes |
Significant | Did not provide evidence to support systematic validation activities on newly developed, purchased or completed training materials or assessment items and some training materials did not appear to meet training package requirements. Training and Assessment Strategies were inconsistent and lacked clarity and specific information about entry requirements, delivery modes and applicability to student cohorts. Insufficient evidence provided at audit in relation to trainer vocational competence. Assessment instruments for a number of units of competency did not sufficiently address all unit requirements. | Implementation of processes that systematically validates and improves training materials, assessment tools, and evidence requirements including: internal and external stakeholder validation and review of materials and assessment tools against training package requirements Implementation of new training and assessment strategies for each qualification that provide sufficient and accurate information about student cohorts, delivery modes, facilities and equipment required, pre-requisites, human resources and assessment methods. Provision of further evidence and new processes implemented to ensure evidence is captured and trainer industry competence maintained through professional development. Development and provision of a full range of new assessment tools that meet and address unit requirements and support learners in achieving competency. |
Yes |
The RTO demonstrates that it:
|
| Standard 2. The RTO adheres to principles of access and equity and maximises outcomes for clients | |||||
|
Yes |
Significant | Insufficient information provided to students in 6 course brochures. Lack of a mechanism to capture employer verification of on-the-job competency in CUV30403 | Development of new course brochures that provide students with all relevant information. Development of a new assessment tool to verify on-the-job competency for this qualification. |
Yes |
The RTO demonstrated:
|
| Standard 3. Management Systems are responsive to the needs of clients, staff and stakeholders, and the environment in which the RTO operates | |||||
|
Yes |
Significant | RTO is not consistently monitoring the effectiveness of partnership arrangements | Implementation of revised partnership arrangements, validation processes and monitoring and audit schedules to ensure effectiveness of training and assessment services and compliance with relevant aspects of the AQTF. |
Yes |
The RTO has:
|
Bridgeworks Head Office
At Bridgeworks, we strive to help people get a job, and keep a job, with a special focus on the disadvantaged.